Upcoming: The Tweed Run
Go Back   London Fixed-gear and Single-speed > General


 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 25th October 2007   #1
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
The mean streets of 'ol London Town + Fixed gear = [color=red]?[/color] crank length.


[color=red][size=40]?[/size][/color]


Cheers.
  quote   reply
Registered users don't see adverts. Signup or signin to hide them.
Old 25th October 2007   #2
hippy
 
hippy's Avatar
165mm on Raleigh
170mm on Soma
172.5mm on Ribble (geared)
175mm on GT (geared)

I don't pedal strike on any but I'm slow through corners.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #3
big daddy wayne
 
big daddy wayne's Avatar
yes hippy is an expert on being cranky
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #4
ro-LAND
Unless you are happening to do a TT in the service roads of the Thames Flood Barrier, I would say 170mm is fine.

But 165mm is better.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #5
big daddy wayne
 
big daddy wayne's Avatar
hippy feeling a little cranky....

  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #6
dogsballs
 
dogsballs's Avatar
on track frames 165mm or 170mm never pedal strike, 170mm on a touring frame + lyotard wide pedals = lotsa strike :(
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #7
hippy
 
hippy's Avatar
Quote:
wayne_f14:yes hippy is an expert on being cranky
boom tish! jelly snake for wayno!
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #8
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
Cheers ladies.

165mm it is.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #9
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
Quote:
dogsballs:on track frames 165mm or 170mm never pedal strike, 170mm on a touring frame + lyotard wide pedals = lotsa strike :(
what 'lyotard' mean boss ?

(Lycra+retard?)
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #10
TheBrick(Tommy)
 
TheBrick(Tommy)'s Avatar
= hippy?
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #11
rusty
Quote:
hippy:
Quote:
wayne_f14:yes hippy is an expert on being cranky
boom tish! jelly snake for wayno!
Aww I'd love a Jelly snake.

Something I heard yesterday:

"I don't associate bears and worms at all. Not until I think of the word gummy"
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #12
Momentum
You need to think about your height and leg length as well, since that's the main criteria for crank length. People usually go a bit shorter on fixed gears than on geared bikes to minimise the risk of pedal strike and to be able to spin faster (since you can't change gear to stay at a steady cadence). I would say on a fixed gear that most people go for 165mm with people with legs longer than about 33" starting to go for 170s. Some companies do 167.5s which could be a happy medium.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #13
dogsballs
 
dogsballs's Avatar
Quote:
tynan:
Quote:
dogsballs:on track frames 165mm or 170mm never pedal strike, 170mm on a touring frame + lyotard wide pedals = lotsa strike :(
what 'lyotard' mean boss ?

(Lycra+retard?)

nice vintage pedals ;)
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #14
stompy
 
stompy's Avatar
Quote:
roland:Unless you are happening to do a TT in the service roads of the Thames Flood Barrier, I would say 170mm is fine.

But 165mm is better.
I managed on 170 - but I came last. :-(

I hear that shorter is easier for spinning and skidding.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #15
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
Quote:
dogsballs:
Quote:
tynan:
Quote:
dogsballs:on track frames 165mm or 170mm never pedal strike, 170mm on a touring frame + lyotard wide pedals = lotsa strike :(
what 'lyotard' mean boss ?

(Lycra+retard?)

nice vintage pedals ;)
Gotcha !
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #16
badtmy
 
badtmy's Avatar
i think about 5-7 minutes should do it.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #17
hippy
 
hippy's Avatar
Quote:
TheBrick(Tommy):= hippy?
I resemble that remark!
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #18
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
Quote:
Momentum:You need to think about your height and leg length as well, since that's the main criteria for crank length. People usually go a bit shorter on fixed gears than on geared bikes to minimise the risk of pedal strike and to be able to spin faster (since you can't change gear to stay at a steady cadence). I would say on a fixed gear that most people go for 165mm with people with legs longer than about 33" starting to go for 170s. Some companies do 167.5s which could be a happy medium.
Cheers, good information, I do happen to have (beautiful) long legs (for my height) - so maybe 170mm might be an option (?)

. . . wait, let me get a tape measure . . . .

How do you measure leg length ??

Is it the bottom of your foot (the floor) right up to the inside of the crown jewels ?
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #19
tynan
 
tynan's Avatar
I uses this method:

The procedure is as follows: Stand in an upright position, without shoes, on a hard floor, and with your feet about 25cm (10") apart. Place the spine of a book about 1.5 inches (3.5cm) wide between your legs firmly, but without causing pain. The measure is then taken vertically from floor to the edge of the book.

I came out at 33.75".

If I can find a 675.5mm that would be great, but it looks like 165mm / 170mm should also be fine - (they are going on a track frame).

I normally ride 175mm on my MTB.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #20
kilgore_trout
165 on all fixed gears
172.5 on my road bike

certain velodromes mandate 165 cranks.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #21
BringMeMyFix
 
BringMeMyFix's Avatar
165s probably give you about 10 extra rpm at the top end of your cadence spectrum.

I went back to 170s cos I can still manage 200rpm with 'em, and I can use the extra leverage to get up severe climbs. (I'm 31" IL)

In an ideal world where I had more bikes and money, I'd have 165s on my track bike, 170s on my road fixed, and 180s on my hillclimb bike, but life's too short....

... though in an ideal world I'd have one life a bit longer than my other one to give me more time to get up climbs.
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #22
Momentum
I'm no expert, but it's the modern world so I was able to google for this which is a pretty good summary. Also Bringmemyfix covers the key points.

http://www.cptips.com/crnklth.htm

Key quote to remember there "Track riders generally choose crankarms up to 5 mm shorter and mountain bikers up to 5 mm longer than the above recommendations"
  quote   reply
Old 25th October 2007   #23
hippy
 
hippy's Avatar
Every piece of advice with a grain of salt, e.g. "trackies will use 165mm".. yeah sure, that is quite common on the track but what if you're a pursuiter? Some guys are using 180mm cranks on the track! I can feel a difference within the 165-175mm range but it's not massive so it will come down to use of bike and personal feeling of various cranks. Spin to win!

More: http://www.cyclingforums.com/t123442-track-crank-length.html
  quote   reply

Bookmarks Shortcuts
Posts Categories
Registered users don't see adverts. Signup or signin to hide them.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3l 3t spoke length chris crash Mechanics & Fixin' 9 6th February 2008 22:25
Crank length... cookie Bikes & Bits 7 11th January 2008 13:07
Chain length RandyFreddo Mechanics & Fixin' 4 19th November 2007 20:55
Stem length... What's it all about then? rusty Bikes & Bits 27 11th October 2007 22:07
Stem length AlexS General 16 6th September 2007 08:31

Creative Commons License All times are GMT. The time now is 21:03.