| | #12 |
| | You need to think about your height and leg length as well, since that's the main criteria for crank length. People usually go a bit shorter on fixed gears than on geared bikes to minimise the risk of pedal strike and to be able to spin faster (since you can't change gear to stay at a steady cadence). I would say on a fixed gear that most people go for 165mm with people with legs longer than about 33" starting to go for 170s. Some companies do 167.5s which could be a happy medium. |
| quote reply |
| | #18 | |
| | Quote:
. . . wait, let me get a tape measure . . . . How do you measure leg length ?? Is it the bottom of your foot (the floor) right up to the inside of the crown jewels ? | |
| quote reply |
| | #19 |
| | I uses this method: The procedure is as follows: Stand in an upright position, without shoes, on a hard floor, and with your feet about 25cm (10") apart. Place the spine of a book about 1.5 inches (3.5cm) wide between your legs firmly, but without causing pain. The measure is then taken vertically from floor to the edge of the book. I came out at 33.75". If I can find a 675.5mm that would be great, but it looks like 165mm / 170mm should also be fine - (they are going on a track frame). I normally ride 175mm on my MTB. |
| quote reply |
| | #21 |
| | 165s probably give you about 10 extra rpm at the top end of your cadence spectrum. I went back to 170s cos I can still manage 200rpm with 'em, and I can use the extra leverage to get up severe climbs. (I'm 31" IL) In an ideal world where I had more bikes and money, I'd have 165s on my track bike, 170s on my road fixed, and 180s on my hillclimb bike, but life's too short.... ... though in an ideal world I'd have one life a bit longer than my other one to give me more time to get up climbs. |
| quote reply |
| | #22 |
| | I'm no expert, but it's the modern world so I was able to google for this which is a pretty good summary. Also Bringmemyfix covers the key points. http://www.cptips.com/crnklth.htm Key quote to remember there "Track riders generally choose crankarms up to 5 mm shorter and mountain bikers up to 5 mm longer than the above recommendations" |
| quote reply |
| | #23 |
| | Every piece of advice with a grain of salt, e.g. "trackies will use 165mm".. yeah sure, that is quite common on the track but what if you're a pursuiter? Some guys are using 180mm cranks on the track! I can feel a difference within the 165-175mm range but it's not massive so it will come down to use of bike and personal feeling of various cranks. Spin to win! More: http://www.cyclingforums.com/t123442-track-crank-length.html |
| quote reply |
| Bookmarks | Shortcuts | |
| Posts | Categories | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3l 3t spoke length | chris crash | Mechanics & Fixin' | 9 | 6th February 2008 22:25 |
| Crank length... | cookie | Bikes & Bits | 7 | 11th January 2008 13:07 |
| Chain length | RandyFreddo | Mechanics & Fixin' | 4 | 19th November 2007 20:55 |
| Stem length... What's it all about then? | rusty | Bikes & Bits | 27 | 11th October 2007 22:07 |
| Stem length | AlexS | General | 16 | 6th September 2007 08:31 |